Style vs. Substance
Up until a little over a year ago, I had used PCs and Windows exclusively. I won't get into the merits of the Mac vs. PC debate as that's one conversation that will never die, no matter what the market share is. However, having used Windows 3.1, 95, 98 (both editions), ME, 2000, and XP, I wanted to weigh in on my disappointment with Microsoft at their Professional Developers Conference this year, and in general over the last few years.
The more and more I listen to Microsoft spout off rhetoric about Windows Vista (codename Longorn), the more and more it disappoints me. It's becoming sadly clear that it's all style and no substance, and the worst part is that it's not even terribly great style either. Microsoft has been promising features that will blow the competition out of the water, but as of yet, we haven't seen any of these features (which range from networking, search, security, etc.) that will be in Vista. And I got to thinking why they wouldn't want to show off such "groundbreaking" features. What they continually say is that they're afraid someone will rip the ideas off. C'mon.
On top of all of that, an article was released last week that said the following: "During Gates' keynote address at the company's Professional Developers Conference here, Microsoft previewed new graphical elements in Vista that let PC users navigate thumbnail images of open windows --including live video--and a new user interface for Office that eliminates drop-down menus."
As reports streamed in from PDC 05, what were we actually seeing? The UI. Nothing more. (I find it hilarious that Microsoft has to codename everything, even their new Alt+Tab, called Flip.) They spent time showing Alt+Tab at a conference geared at professional software developers and no one called them on it? That's ridiculous. What about Office 12. What did we see there? The UI, nothing more. Where are these security improvements that they keep heralding? Oh wait, they don't want to show them to the public because they're afraid Apple is gonna rip of Windows security. That's absolute nonsense. Last I checked, there were still no viruses that affect OS X, but over 10,000 new viruses for Windows in the first 6 months of 2005. Yes, Apple wants to rip off Windows security.
Then, eWeek interviews Steve Ballmer and the question of competing OSes comes up. What does he say regarding it? He calls features "kissing cousins" of competitors' products. Isn't this just a fancy way of saying that Microsoft has ripped off Apple ... again?
First of all, let me address this issue of features that Microsoft showed at PDC this year ... blatant knock-offs of Apple's iCal and iPhoto. Sure, I'm happy that Microsoft is finally building those into the OS, but what took so long? Why wasn't it there in XP? I'm not even gonna get into the Gadget issue since that wasn't an original Apple idea either, but I find it interesting that Gadgets wasn't a part of Vista until shortly after Tiger was launched with Dashboard. Call it a coincidence. Transparencies, scalable graphics, window transitions? I don't mind that these things are being added, but for Bill Gates to stand on a stage and herald them as some innovative creation of Microsoft is absolute garbage.
On top of that, a week later, Microsoft announced that they would be completely revamping Outlook Express and renaming it to Windows Mail. Umm ... can you say Apple Mail? And to add insult to injury, they're planning on making the whole thing look like Outlook 2003. Can anyone tell me what the point in buying Outlook will be now, because I don't see any.
Microsoft shows off a User Interface that isn't even finished and everyone oohs and aahs. I want to actually see some of these features in use when I see demos of Vista. At the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference 2 years ago, Steve Jobs talked about Spotlight and how it would change the user's experience allowing them to find anything on their machine almost instantly. Jobs didn't talk about it then move on, no, he talked about it, then showed it. He was able to do 1 or 2 searches, then it crashed. So what? He showed it, even in its half-finished state. He talked about 64-bit processes then called someone up to the stage to show it working on Tiger. Who cares if Gates gets a blue screen of death, show us the features!
According to Microsoft, we're a little over a year from getting this in our hands, but as it stands now, I don't want it in my hands. Beta 2 signals the feature lockdown. You're telling me that Microsoft has about 6 months to lock down all these features they've been promising for the last 2 years? I just don't think it's gonna happen and Vista is shaping up to be the biggest software flop of the computer age.
Don't get me wrong, even though I'm a Mac person, I still like to see Microsoft do something worthwhile, but after hearing the same old rhetoric for 2 years now, it means very little to me. What amazes me is that these tech analysts sit there and take it and say it's the greatest thing ever. I think it's about time to call Microsoft on their bluff.

